Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 2:19 — 5.3MB)

Subscribe: RSS

This is a deleted segment from this week’s podcast that didn’t make the final cut due to length.

In the ongoing New York Times v. OpenAI litigation, most attention has focused on the demand for 20 million ChatGPT conversations. But there’s another issue that’s been largely overlooked: OpenAI’s deletion of two training datasets (Books1 and Books2) and how plaintiffs are not only claiming that’s destroying evidence but are attempting to use that decision to pierce attorney-client privilege.

Of course, in other cases, not deleting the training data was infringing, too!

This is just a short ~2-minute clip, but an important piece of the puzzle!

Memorandum of Law in Support (non-motion) – #926 in In Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation

🔊Pᴏᴅᴄᴀꜱᴛ: https://podcast.bogosity.tv/
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/
▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk
▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4
▶️Rᴜᴍʙʟᴇ https://rumble.com/c/shanedk
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
💰Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv