﻿WEBVTT

00:00:02.940 --> 00:00:06.860
The Bogosity Podcast,
early and ad-free!

00:00:06.860 --> 00:00:11.100
Become a subscriber at Patreon,
SubscribeStar, or Discord.

00:00:11.100 --> 00:00:17.033
Use the links at donate.bogosity.tv.

00:00:25.500 --> 00:00:30.060
Welcome to the Bogosity Podcast
for the week of August 3rd 2025,

00:00:30.060 --> 00:00:33.655
the podcast that
turned lose the juice.

00:00:37.820 --> 00:00:43.767
This is your host, Shane Killian.
Let's abnegate the News of the Bogus.

00:00:43.768 --> 00:00:47.020
You know, it wasn't a great week for me,

00:00:47.020 --> 00:00:52.966
but once again, I can see the sun peek
out from behind the dark, stormy clouds

00:00:52.966 --> 00:00:57.588
and lift my spirits with
just a single thought:

00:00:57.588 --> 00:01:01.020
At least I don't live in Australia!

00:01:01.020 --> 00:01:06.940
In what had to have given the world's most
popular video site a serious case of whiplash,

00:01:06.940 --> 00:01:12.700
the Australian government did an about-face
<i>again,</i> mere months after the last one,

00:01:12.700 --> 00:01:17.420
and said that below-16-year-olds
are now banned from the platform.

00:01:17.420 --> 00:01:22.780
It follows on from November when Parliament
passed laws, first of its kind in the world,

00:01:22.780 --> 00:01:28.620
banning children from Facebook,
Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X.

00:01:28.620 --> 00:01:32.220
YouTube was given an
exemption, but not any more.

00:01:32.220 --> 00:01:39.820
Communications Minister Anika Wells released new rules
that decide which online services must restrict children.

00:01:39.820 --> 00:01:45.180
After December 10, these platforms
will face fines up to $50 million

00:01:45.180 --> 00:01:50.940
if they fail to take "responsible
steps" to ban underage account holders.

00:01:50.940 --> 00:01:57.099
They did absolutely nothing to say
what "responsible steps" means.

00:01:57.100 --> 00:02:03.100
Wells vowed that her government would not be
intimidated by YouTube's threats of legal action,

00:02:03.100 --> 00:02:05.660
in a statement mimicking
a schoolyard bully

00:02:05.660 --> 00:02:11.580
who says his efforts to steal lunch money won't
be bullied by threats of telling the principal.

00:02:11.580 --> 00:02:15.420
Quote: "We will not be
intimidated by legal threats

00:02:15.420 --> 00:02:20.780
when this is a genuine fight for
the wellbeing of Australian kids."

00:02:20.780 --> 00:02:22.780
Yeah, really.

00:02:22.780 --> 00:02:26.940
YouTube said in a statement,
quote: "Our position remains clear:

00:02:26.940 --> 00:02:31.980
YouTube is a video sharing platform with
a library of free, high-quality content,

00:02:31.980 --> 00:02:36.700
increasingly viewed on TV
screens. It's not social media."

00:02:36.700 --> 00:02:39.820
Yeah, we've all seen everything
they've done over the last decade

00:02:39.820 --> 00:02:45.340
to make sure every last bit of anything
social has been excised from the site.

00:02:45.340 --> 00:02:48.380
Prime Minister Anthony
Albanese said, quote:

00:02:48.380 --> 00:02:52.700
"I know from the discussions I've had with
other leaders that they are looking at this

00:02:52.700 --> 00:02:58.460
and they are considering what impact social media is
having on young people in their respective nations.

00:02:58.460 --> 00:03:03.660
It is a common experience. This
is not an Australian experience."

00:03:03.660 --> 00:03:10.540
Because <i>of course</i> the idea is to use this as model
legislation in Europe, America, and other countries.

00:03:10.540 --> 00:03:13.420
But then, of course, there are all
of the problems we've pointed out

00:03:13.420 --> 00:03:18.780
with all of the age verification laws they've
been passing in Europe and various US states.

00:03:18.780 --> 00:03:21.020
Of that, Wells said:

00:03:21.020 --> 00:03:24.660
"Platforms have to provide an
alternative to providing your own

00:03:24.661 --> 00:03:29.660
personal identification documents
to satisfy themselves of age."

00:03:29.660 --> 00:03:33.180
Yeah, just figure it out somehow!

00:03:33.180 --> 00:03:37.660
At what point will they realize that
this is not going to achieve anything?

00:03:37.660 --> 00:03:43.740
Of course, they <i>do</i> realize that, because it's
been pointed out to them time and time again.

00:03:43.740 --> 00:03:51.100
Once again, we see how "protect the children" is just
an excuse for government control and surveillance.

00:03:51.100 --> 00:03:54.860
There definitely needs to be more
voices speaking out against this

00:03:54.860 --> 00:03:59.726
and many other assaults against freedom of
speech, which seem to be ramping up lately.

00:03:59.726 --> 00:04:08.220
Remember that free speech isn't just about the right of
people to speak; it's about the right of others to hear.

00:04:08.220 --> 00:04:13.331
And in case you're thinking the risks involved
in identity verification are overstated,

00:04:13.331 --> 00:04:16.442
stick around for the next segment.

00:04:20.460 --> 00:04:26.220
Sometimes you just have
to STOMP SOME SKULLS.

00:04:26.220 --> 00:04:30.940
From the mind of Mr. Dapperton,
a game for the ages!

00:04:30.940 --> 00:04:37.100
In a world where a race of undead furries
tries to take over the world's nuclear arsenal,

00:04:37.100 --> 00:04:42.940
one man must stop them,
but <i>which</i> man? <i>You</i> choose!

00:04:42.940 --> 00:04:46.100
The Orange Overlord...

00:04:46.380 --> 00:04:48.700
Berny Slanders...

00:04:48.700 --> 00:04:51.380
Debate Dominator...

00:04:51.980 --> 00:04:54.740
or Joe Sleepy.

00:04:54.780 --> 00:04:59.020
And of course,
Mr. Fancy Pants himself!

00:04:59.020 --> 00:05:05.900
Forget those losers! You can get the GOLD
edition and play as four more characters!

00:05:05.900 --> 00:05:08.860
Including me, the Spooky Spaceman,

00:05:08.860 --> 00:05:12.060
along with Billionaire
Brat, Professor Proof,

00:05:12.060 --> 00:05:16.700
and the easiest way to
play: as Jesus Himself!

00:05:16.700 --> 00:05:20.780
<i>Seven</i> complete different worlds,
with more coming all the time.

00:05:20.780 --> 00:05:22.460
Full controller support.

00:05:22.460 --> 00:05:27.900
You can even get...eaten by a worm!
And pooped out into a furry cathedral.

00:05:27.900 --> 00:05:34.860
And don't forget that Gold Edition, where you can
play the ultimate challenge: Devil's Doorstep!

00:05:34.860 --> 00:05:39.580
This gory, satirical
adventure pulls no punches!

00:05:39.580 --> 00:05:42.060
You <i>know</i> you want this game!

00:05:42.060 --> 00:05:49.637
Go to links.bogosity.tv/skullstompers
and play Skull Stompers <i>now!</i>

00:05:56.140 --> 00:06:03.900
What's bad? A data breach of a site that exposed
the personal information of 72,000 users.

00:06:03.900 --> 00:06:09.180
What's worse? When that data breach
includes pictures of their ID!

00:06:09.180 --> 00:06:14.060
It was always inevitable once
governments started passing AML/KYC laws,

00:06:14.060 --> 00:06:18.496
and indeed it's happened once or
twice already, but this one is <i>big.</i>

00:06:18.497 --> 00:06:25.740
The app is called Tea, which allows women to post comments
about men they don't like. As in, spill the tea on them.

00:06:25.740 --> 00:06:29.180
It sounds like one of those things
that started as a good idea.

00:06:29.180 --> 00:06:33.340
Women felt they needed an app
where, if they got catfished online,

00:06:33.340 --> 00:06:36.700
they could let other women
know who that man <i>really</i> was.

00:06:36.700 --> 00:06:39.900
They could even let you do background
checks to tell if he's a criminal,

00:06:39.900 --> 00:06:44.220
or see his real marital status—in
case he lied about that.

00:06:44.220 --> 00:06:47.340
And indeed, there are many
risks with dating apps.

00:06:47.340 --> 00:06:51.020
And so this was meant to mitigate
some of those risks with women.

00:06:51.020 --> 00:06:53.020
But where it went from there?

00:06:53.020 --> 00:06:55.980
It was always a little bit
of a privacy violation,

00:06:55.980 --> 00:07:00.940
but then, if you're going to put your real self
out there, you have to lower those expectations.

00:07:00.940 --> 00:07:05.500
But the site ended up going
<i>way</i> beyond anything reasonable.

00:07:05.500 --> 00:07:12.460
I mean, come on, we all know how exes can be!
Many breakups are amiable, but in other cases?

00:07:12.460 --> 00:07:19.740
The ex—whether male or female—is just out to
trash the other person to everyone in the world.

00:07:19.740 --> 00:07:22.780
So it basically became
a defamation app.

00:07:22.780 --> 00:07:25.980
A woman's ex, or even someone
who just turned her down,

00:07:25.980 --> 00:07:32.380
can find themselves publicly trashed on the site
without any sort of verification whatsoever.

00:07:32.380 --> 00:07:37.420
Basically, it's the ultimate gossip
app for women of the worst sorts.

00:07:37.420 --> 00:07:39.820
It doesn't help that in
the terms of service,

00:07:39.820 --> 00:07:43.660
Tea disclaims themselves of all
liability for false information

00:07:43.660 --> 00:07:47.260
and says that's solely the
responsibility of the user.

00:07:47.260 --> 00:07:51.740
They also say you're not to use the app to
defame anyone or abuse them or whatever,

00:07:51.740 --> 00:07:55.660
but there's no indication that
they ever actually police that.

00:07:55.660 --> 00:08:04.140
And there's no system whatsoever that lets men notify the
app and its users that it has false information about them.

00:08:04.140 --> 00:08:11.980
And even worse, it became a doxxing app, where women were
sharing personal details of men they dated or tried to date.

00:08:11.980 --> 00:08:16.380
Which is why a lot of people find it
completely ironic what happened next.

00:08:16.380 --> 00:08:19.100
See, to verify the women's identity,

00:08:19.100 --> 00:08:24.380
they had to take a selfie of themselves holding
up their driver's license or other government ID.

00:08:24.380 --> 00:08:28.540
Just like other KYC websites
such as crypto exchanges.

00:08:28.540 --> 00:08:31.820
And it all got hacked by 4chan.

00:08:31.820 --> 00:08:37.980
The initial post announcing the hack started a thread where
4channers shared images they were pulling from the site

00:08:37.980 --> 00:08:41.660
of women's information
and their ID and pictures.

00:08:41.660 --> 00:08:45.900
Now, I say hacked, it really wasn't.

00:08:45.900 --> 00:08:53.260
Because Tea didn't have <i>any</i> of these behind any sort of
privacy shield, password protection, or anything else!

00:08:53.260 --> 00:08:58.380
They were all stored in the
plain on public-facing URLs!

00:08:58.380 --> 00:09:05.900
The 4chan post read: "Yes, if you sent Tea App your
face and drivers license, they doxxed you publicly!

00:09:05.900 --> 00:09:09.900
No authentication, no
nothing. It's a public bucket.

00:09:09.900 --> 00:09:15.020
I have written a Python script which scrapes
the bucket and downloads all the images,

00:09:15.020 --> 00:09:18.380
page by page, so you can
see if you're in it."

00:09:18.380 --> 00:09:23.180
Remember: pictures aren't just
pictures, but metadata as well,

00:09:23.180 --> 00:09:28.380
so most of them had the GPS coordinates of
where the person was when they took the selfie.

00:09:28.380 --> 00:09:35.100
Which is really awkward for the person who did it while
working on the flight line at a top secret military base!

00:09:35.100 --> 00:09:36.856
Cue the memes.

00:09:36.857 --> 00:09:39.180
The Tea developers
said in a statement:

00:09:39.180 --> 00:09:45.500
"We have engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and
are working around the clock to secure our systems.

00:09:45.500 --> 00:09:51.100
At this time, we have implemented additional
security measures and have fixed the data issue."

00:09:51.100 --> 00:09:54.860
In unrelated news, a farming
company said in a statement:

00:09:54.860 --> 00:09:58.745
"We have engaged third-party locksmiths
and are working around the clock

00:09:58.746 --> 00:10:03.346
to close the barn doors now
that the horses are long gone."

00:10:03.346 --> 00:10:11.013
<i>Morons,</i> the time to have engaged cybersecurity
experts would have been <i>when you created the site!</i>

00:10:11.013 --> 00:10:17.020
Especially if you're going to make people give
up their identities! Doing it now does nothing.

00:10:17.020 --> 00:10:21.660
There's no sense in telling these women
not to worry, because they <i>should</i> worry!

00:10:21.660 --> 00:10:27.580
All the Python scripts that were run to
scrape the data have long finished their jobs!

00:10:27.580 --> 00:10:33.740
That data is all out there, and you can't remove it
any more than you can remove pee from a swimming pool.

00:10:33.740 --> 00:10:37.260
And that's really the lesson:
whether it's crypto exchanges,

00:10:37.260 --> 00:10:40.700
or age verification, or
even just apps like this,

00:10:40.700 --> 00:10:45.420
your information being stolen
isn't a matter of if, but when.

00:10:45.420 --> 00:10:48.940
The more sites do this, it won't
matter how well they secure it.

00:10:48.940 --> 00:10:52.860
Sooner or later, a breach
of some kind <i>will</i> happen.

00:10:52.860 --> 00:10:57.340
See our previous coverage of the
Exquifax, OPM, and Salt Typhoon attacks:

00:10:57.340 --> 00:11:02.300
if you have a Social Security number and
you're wondering if hackers have it, they do.

00:11:02.300 --> 00:11:07.100
And that's with government agencies, credit
bureaus, and even the National Guard.

00:11:07.100 --> 00:11:14.220
Places where people absolutely would expect them to
do everything feasible to protect our private data.

00:11:14.220 --> 00:11:20.540
Look, I'm not saying that Tea didn't fuck
up (because <i>oh my God</i> did they fuck up!),

00:11:20.540 --> 00:11:25.340
but this sort of thing <i>will</i> happen,
and is just a matter of time,

00:11:25.340 --> 00:11:29.820
the more governments force websites
to keep our identifying information!

00:11:29.820 --> 00:11:33.420
And the more information they
require, the worse it gets!

00:11:33.420 --> 00:11:38.540
And this should be all the reason you
need—as if we didn't have a thousand others—

00:11:38.540 --> 00:11:42.296
to oppose all of the other KYC
and adult verification laws

00:11:42.297 --> 00:11:46.420
that have been and are being passed,
including many we've covered.

00:11:46.421 --> 00:11:48.700
Just sign up for HaveIBeenPwned.

00:11:48.700 --> 00:11:54.140
You'll find there are all sorts of breaches
going on all the time from all sorts of websites.

00:11:54.140 --> 00:11:57.980
For example, recently tea of
a different sort got hacked

00:11:57.980 --> 00:12:05.580
when attackers swiped 160,000 records from Creams
Café, "the UK's favourite dessert parlour,"

00:12:05.580 --> 00:12:09.820
including emails, physical
addresses, names, and phone numbers.

00:12:09.820 --> 00:12:15.020
Now if that had been an age verification
site, what else would the hackers have gotten?

00:12:15.020 --> 00:12:22.220
By the way, does anyone else remember when the advice was
never to give out any of your personal information online?

00:12:22.220 --> 00:12:28.940
So okay, laugh at the irony of Tea and say that they
and the horrible women on it got their just deserts.

00:12:28.940 --> 00:12:31.980
But sooner or later, it'll be you or me.

00:12:31.980 --> 00:12:36.620
And identity theft remains one of the most
terrible things that can happen to a person,

00:12:36.620 --> 00:12:42.806
that many never recover from.
<i>That</i> is what is at stake here.

00:12:47.340 --> 00:12:49.740
If you're on the Wi-Fi in
a coffee shop or hotel,

00:12:49.740 --> 00:12:52.060
anyone on that network can
get access to your traffic.

00:12:52.060 --> 00:12:54.380
Do you <i>really</i> trust
all of those strangers?

00:12:54.380 --> 00:12:57.260
For that matter, do you
<i>really</i> trust your ISP?

00:12:57.260 --> 00:13:03.340
A VPN can protect you from prying eyes, disguise
your location, and even foil government censors.

00:13:03.340 --> 00:13:09.980
It's essential in this day and age, so go to
vpn.bogosity.tv and you'll be taken to BoxPN.

00:13:09.980 --> 00:13:11.900
Starting at just $2.99/month,

00:13:11.900 --> 00:13:16.460
you can get unlimited high-speed connections
to VPN servers all over the world,

00:13:16.460 --> 00:13:19.980
and they <i>don't</i> log connections
so your privacy is assured.

00:13:19.980 --> 00:13:25.100
Travelling abroad, just VPN home and don't worry
about what those other governments are doing.

00:13:25.100 --> 00:13:27.980
Back at home, stop your
ISP from traffic-shaping

00:13:27.980 --> 00:13:31.980
and messing with the quality internet
access you're paying good money for.

00:13:31.980 --> 00:13:35.740
You can connect from multiple machines at
once, including your smartphone or tablet,

00:13:35.740 --> 00:13:40.700
and it supports all the secure
standards including OpenVPN and SSTP.

00:13:40.700 --> 00:13:47.188
Bypass censors and surveillance with your own
secure VPN connection. Go to vpn.bogosity.tv.

00:13:53.180 --> 00:13:57.900
So, you remember Trump threatening to
primary Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie

00:13:57.900 --> 00:14:02.780
and we were wondering how he was going to do
that, given Massie's extensive grassroots support?

00:14:02.780 --> 00:14:05.020
Well, we've got our first preview.

00:14:05.020 --> 00:14:13.420
The MAGA KY super PAC has raised $2 million in the last
two months, apparently with a focus on unseating Massie.

00:14:13.420 --> 00:14:18.700
According to an FEC filing on Thursday,
half of that money came from Paul Singer,

00:14:18.700 --> 00:14:21.820
billionaire hedge fund manager
and one of the top contributors

00:14:21.820 --> 00:14:24.700
to the National Republican
Senatorial Committee.

00:14:24.700 --> 00:14:30.460
In 2016, Singer helped bankroll a PAC dedicated
to stopping Trump from getting elected,

00:14:30.460 --> 00:14:35.660
and historically has given to establishment
candidates such as Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney.

00:14:35.660 --> 00:14:39.900
He also funded opposition research
that led to the Steele Dossier.

00:14:39.900 --> 00:14:44.860
Most of the rest came from the Preserve
America PAC, tied to Miriam Adelson,

00:14:44.860 --> 00:14:52.060
billionaire widow of casino magnate Sheldon Adelson and
one of the most influential Republican Party donors.

00:14:52.060 --> 00:14:57.820
She also has traditionally supported establishment
Republicans like Mitt Romney and Nikki Haley.

00:14:57.820 --> 00:15:02.140
And pretty much all of the rest came from
billionaire hedge fund manager John Paulson,

00:15:02.140 --> 00:15:05.260
who serves on the board of the
Council on Foreign Relations.

00:15:05.260 --> 00:15:11.660
He profited massively from the 2008 financial
crisis and was also a supporter of Mitt Romney.

00:15:11.660 --> 00:15:13.980
And apparently, this
is just the start.

00:15:13.980 --> 00:15:20.620
This super PAC is drawing massive funding from three of
the wealthiest establishment Republican Party donors,

00:15:20.620 --> 00:15:24.700
with several months to go before
the Kentucky primary in May.

00:15:24.700 --> 00:15:28.780
And that could mean massively
outspending any grassroots campaign,

00:15:28.780 --> 00:15:33.420
probably by running attack ads saying
he's disloyal to Trump and MAGA,

00:15:33.420 --> 00:15:38.060
focusing on things like his opposition
to the One Big Beautiful Bill.

00:15:38.060 --> 00:15:42.540
Of course, Massie's from Kentucky,
so he should know how to make hay.

00:15:42.540 --> 00:15:49.420
I mean, come on: establishment Republican
billionaires? So much for MAGA being populist!

00:15:49.420 --> 00:15:51.500
Massie wouldn't have to outspend them

00:15:51.500 --> 00:15:57.260
to run enough ads pointing out that he's just
being a target of the wealthy Republican elite.

00:15:57.260 --> 00:16:00.780
That could end up galvanizing
his grassroots base.

00:16:00.780 --> 00:16:04.700
Of course, that kind of funding can
be a strain on a grassroots campaign,

00:16:04.700 --> 00:16:08.700
so it would mostly depend on individual
activity of Massie's supporters

00:16:08.700 --> 00:16:11.660
both in the real world
and on social media.

00:16:11.660 --> 00:16:15.100
Massie was in office for four
years before Trump was elected,

00:16:15.100 --> 00:16:18.860
and he staved off the Republican
primary challengers before.

00:16:18.860 --> 00:16:22.060
And they also still don't have
a candidate to oppose him.

00:16:22.060 --> 00:16:27.340
But I wouldn't be at all surprised if they've got some
establishment hack waiting in the wings somewhere.

00:16:27.340 --> 00:16:29.740
We'll just have to see
how this goes, I guess.

00:16:29.740 --> 00:16:36.406
In the meantime, like I said: so much for Trump
being against the Republican establishment!

00:16:42.380 --> 00:16:45.820
I want to tell you about the
eyeglasses I've been wearing for years.

00:16:45.820 --> 00:16:49.340
As people can see on my videos, I
have a <i>very</i> strong prescription,

00:16:49.340 --> 00:16:53.340
which makes glasses more expensive,
especially when I need computer glasses,

00:16:53.340 --> 00:16:55.660
reading glasses,
prescription sunglasses,

00:16:55.660 --> 00:17:00.300
and most expensively, progressive
lenses for general everyday wear.

00:17:00.300 --> 00:17:04.700
To save money while still getting
quality glasses, I get them from Firmoo.

00:17:04.700 --> 00:17:08.780
In fact, I just got a pair of progressives
with high index aspherical lenses

00:17:08.780 --> 00:17:13.020
in a nice pair of frames my
wife loves, for just over $100.

00:17:13.020 --> 00:17:16.300
It would have been $500 to get
them through my eye doctor.

00:17:16.300 --> 00:17:19.100
Not only do they look good,
the glasses are durable.

00:17:19.100 --> 00:17:22.620
I've worn many pairs for
several years without problems.

00:17:22.620 --> 00:17:25.180
All orders come with a
30-day return policy,

00:17:25.180 --> 00:17:28.860
a 3-month warranty, and
one-on-one customer service.

00:17:28.860 --> 00:17:37.580
Go to firmoo.bogosity.tv any time you
need quality glasses at a low price.

00:17:37.580 --> 00:17:42.002
Once again, that's
firmoo.bogosity.tv.

00:17:50.380 --> 00:17:54.940
And now it's time to incapacitate
this week's Biggest Bogon Emitter.

00:17:54.940 --> 00:18:01.500
And it's yet another one for <i>The New York Times</i> as they just
can't seem to admit the truth about the RussiaGate hoax.

00:18:01.500 --> 00:18:05.500
The story is about the NSA
firing its top lawyer April Doss,

00:18:05.500 --> 00:18:09.980
who had publicly advocated for Trump
to be banned from public platforms.

00:18:09.980 --> 00:18:14.620
The move comes after Director of National
Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed documents

00:18:14.620 --> 00:18:20.460
containing many more details about the
conspiracy of, quote: "manufactured intelligence"

00:18:20.460 --> 00:18:25.660
designed to sabotage Trump's campaign
and later his first presidential term.

00:18:25.660 --> 00:18:30.140
Senator Mark Warner, then top Democrat
on the Senate intelligence panel,

00:18:30.140 --> 00:18:34.140
hired Doss specifically to
try and tie Trump to Russia.

00:18:34.140 --> 00:18:41.900
Warner said, quote: "We should be outraged by the firing
of April Doss, a deeply principled public servant,

00:18:41.900 --> 00:18:45.500
apparently for the role that she played
in the Senate Intelligence Committee's

00:18:45.500 --> 00:18:49.820
bipartisan investigation into
Russian election interference.

00:18:49.820 --> 00:18:55.020
Her dismissal appears to be the result
of a politically motivated smear campaign

00:18:55.020 --> 00:19:02.860
driven by a far-right conspiracy theorist, not any
legitimate concern about her conduct or qualifications."

00:19:02.860 --> 00:19:07.100
Apologies to everyone whose
Irony Meter just exploded.

00:19:07.100 --> 00:19:11.580
Doss repeatedly advocated for using
the full force of the security state

00:19:11.580 --> 00:19:16.780
to clamp down on "misinformation," which
quite often turned out to be wrong.

00:19:16.780 --> 00:19:20.860
That included using vaccine hesitancy
as a justification for lockdowns,

00:19:20.860 --> 00:19:27.100
and blaming Republican "extremists" for the
manufactured plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer.

00:19:27.100 --> 00:19:32.620
Doss also falsely accused Trump of "insurrection"
even though he was never even charged with it,

00:19:32.620 --> 00:19:38.460
and the only legal forum to examine it, his
Senate trial following his second impeachment,

00:19:38.460 --> 00:19:40.700
resulted in a not guilty verdict.

00:19:40.700 --> 00:19:46.033
Her strong advocacy for government censorship
and clamping down on tech firms and social media,

00:19:46.033 --> 00:19:49.500
including the suppression of
the Hunter Biden laptop story,

00:19:49.500 --> 00:19:54.367
went opposite to the Administration's
policy, not to mention the Constitution.

00:19:54.368 --> 00:20:00.700
NSA officials had concealed how Doss was hired,
and <i>The New York Times</i> (among several others)

00:20:00.700 --> 00:20:05.820
worked directly with Democrats to spread
misinformation after she was terminated.

00:20:05.820 --> 00:20:09.340
They blamed it on Laura
Loomer, saying, quote:

00:20:09.340 --> 00:20:15.420
"A far-right conspiracy theorist had amplified
criticism of the lawyer and her previous work."

00:20:15.420 --> 00:20:21.740
That apparently consisted of a single X post
sharing <i>The Daily Wire's</i> reporting on the story,

00:20:21.740 --> 00:20:25.020
while omitting the details
of the actual findings.

00:20:25.020 --> 00:20:29.820
And that gave cover to the others.
Almost immediately, MSNBC posted:

00:20:29.820 --> 00:20:35.500
"Right-wing influencer allegedly helps oust
a National Security Agency leader (again),"

00:20:35.500 --> 00:20:42.060
and <i>The Daily Beast</i> wrote: "Witch Hunter Laura
Loomer Claims Scalp of NSA's Top Lawyer."

00:20:42.060 --> 00:20:46.082
This is just silly. It's extremely
unlikely to say the least

00:20:46.083 --> 00:20:50.090
that the DNI investigation got
its information from Laura Loomer

00:20:50.091 --> 00:20:53.580
instead of all of the internal
intelligence they had in their hands.

00:20:53.580 --> 00:20:58.700
As for Warner, the only thing he really had
to say in response to the report was, quote:

00:20:58.700 --> 00:21:05.660
"What was Tulsi Gabbard trying to distract from with
her insulting lies about the Russia investigation?"

00:21:05.660 --> 00:21:10.060
I swear, it's hard to keep all the
conspiracy cranks straight these days.

00:21:10.060 --> 00:21:16.646
The only thing that we can really be certain of is that
<i>The New York Times</i> is this week's Biggest Bogon Emitter.

00:21:21.340 --> 00:21:23.980
Do you have children?
Or nieces or nephews?

00:21:23.980 --> 00:21:26.300
Are you homeschooling,
or just want to counter

00:21:26.300 --> 00:21:29.660
some of the socialist indoctrination
most children get in school?

00:21:29.660 --> 00:21:35.420
If so, go to bogosity.tv/tuttletwins,
and you'll be taken to a website

00:21:35.420 --> 00:21:38.780
where you can get some great books
for elementary-aged children.

00:21:38.780 --> 00:21:42.700
The Tuttle Twins books are books about
liberty and free market economics

00:21:42.700 --> 00:21:47.180
that include children's versions of
Bastiat's <i>The Law,</i> Leonard Read's <i>I, Pencil,</i>

00:21:47.180 --> 00:21:50.780
and Hayek's <i>The Road to Serfdom,</i> as
well as books about the Federal Reserve

00:21:50.780 --> 00:21:53.420
and how regulations
protect business cronies.

00:21:53.420 --> 00:21:55.820
They'll learn about the harm
caused by eminent domain,

00:21:55.820 --> 00:22:00.300
or regulations passed in the name of
safety, and fundamental concepts of liberty.

00:22:00.300 --> 00:22:02.860
And as you can see from the
sample pages on the website,

00:22:02.860 --> 00:22:05.820
they're all easy to read
and nicely illustrated.

00:22:05.820 --> 00:22:09.020
They're just $9.99 apiece,
or get a special discount

00:22:09.020 --> 00:22:11.820
as well as free bonuses
when you purchase all five.

00:22:11.820 --> 00:22:15.580
You can even buy in bulk to donate
to schools and local libraries.

00:22:15.580 --> 00:22:21.602
So get the Tuttle Twins books
at bogosity.tv/tuttletwins.

00:22:27.820 --> 00:22:33.068
And now let's absquatulationificize
this week's Idiot Extraordinaire.

00:22:38.220 --> 00:22:44.700
Okay, <i>somebody</i> here is a major idiot. The only
thing I'm sure about right now is that it's not me.

00:22:44.700 --> 00:22:49.340
But this is really a story about how all the
anti-AI people are running out of arguments.

00:22:49.340 --> 00:22:51.980
And forgetting basic
chemistry to boot!

00:22:51.980 --> 00:22:56.780
The complaint is that AI uses
datacenters, and datacenters use water,

00:22:56.780 --> 00:23:01.580
and water is scarce in some places
like Texas, therefore AI is bad.

00:23:01.580 --> 00:23:07.180
This is from <i>The Economic Times,</i> and doesn't
that name just fill you with confidence?

00:23:07.180 --> 00:23:12.140
The opening paragraph reads like something
straight out of a Marxist playbook, quote:

00:23:12.140 --> 00:23:19.100
"Amid the ongoing worsening drought condition in Texas,
the State's residents face an unexpected water dilemma:

00:23:19.100 --> 00:23:25.340
while communities are urged to conserve every
drop, even cutting back on simple showers,

00:23:25.340 --> 00:23:30.140
massive new AI data centers are
quietly using millions of gallons daily

00:23:30.140 --> 00:23:34.300
to keep their operations
running, as per a report."

00:23:34.300 --> 00:23:38.780
See? <i>You're</i> not allowed to
use water! Why are <i>they?</i>

00:23:38.780 --> 00:23:43.500
Mind you, they didn't do anything as
useful as actually linking to the report.

00:23:43.500 --> 00:23:47.740
But the first one they mentioned
was Microsoft's Stargate campus.

00:23:47.740 --> 00:23:51.900
First problem: the Stargate campus
isn't even up and running yet!

00:23:51.900 --> 00:23:55.020
Also, Texas is a <i>huge</i> state.

00:23:55.020 --> 00:23:59.340
While the western part of the state has
low rainfall and even desert conditions,

00:23:59.340 --> 00:24:02.140
much of the eastern part of
the state has plenty of water.

00:24:02.140 --> 00:24:06.300
As for these datacenters, that
water will evaporate indoors.

00:24:06.300 --> 00:24:11.500
But if you're in a dry area, the HVAC
system will be maintaining humidity anyway.

00:24:11.500 --> 00:24:18.220
So that just means the HVAC system will draw less
water from outside to maintain indoor humidity.

00:24:18.220 --> 00:24:22.300
They dazzle you with an Over
9000 Fallacy by saying, quote:

00:24:22.300 --> 00:24:27.580
"Texas AI centers guzzle
463 million gallons."

00:24:27.580 --> 00:24:31.611
First of all, they're not all
about AI, they're just datacenters,

00:24:31.612 --> 00:24:34.122
but apart from that, they're
not giving you the context.

00:24:34.123 --> 00:24:41.900
As with all statistics, and regular listeners should
know the question to ask right now: "Compared to what?"

00:24:41.900 --> 00:24:48.220
Texans use 4.95 <i>trillion</i>
gallons of water every year.

00:24:48.220 --> 00:24:56.860
So datacenters account for about
0.001% of that! One part in 10,700!

00:24:56.860 --> 00:25:02.060
That's not even a drop in the bucket!
But anyway, let's get to the stupidity.

00:25:02.060 --> 00:25:08.220
Robert Mace is the executive director of The Meadows Center
for Water and the Environment at Texas State University.

00:25:08.220 --> 00:25:12.300
So you'd <i>think</i> he knows what he's
talking about. But he said, quote:

00:25:12.300 --> 00:25:17.500
"People don't think of data centers as
industrial water users, but they are.

00:25:17.500 --> 00:25:22.060
Once that water evaporates,
it's just gone."

00:25:22.060 --> 00:25:24.938
Uh...<i>what???</i>

00:25:24.940 --> 00:25:29.340
And the article goes on to say,
quote: "Some water is recycled,

00:25:29.340 --> 00:25:35.340
but a large portion evaporates
during cooling and is lost forever."

00:25:35.340 --> 00:25:41.740
I always had an uneasy inkling that this
is what environmentalists actually believe,

00:25:41.740 --> 00:25:45.420
but seeing it in print
like this? Geez...

00:25:45.420 --> 00:25:49.500
Idiocy aside, this is the thing
that gets me about government.

00:25:49.500 --> 00:25:54.308
Water is the ultimate renewable
resource. But as Milton Friedman said,

00:25:54.308 --> 00:25:59.100
put government in charge of the Sahara
and you'll end up with a shortage of sand.

00:25:59.100 --> 00:26:03.900
We can ship a barrel of oil halfway
around the world for a dollar

00:26:03.900 --> 00:26:08.460
(as long as stupid governments aren't
increasing the price with artificial shortages),

00:26:08.460 --> 00:26:13.580
but government can't move water
more than a dozen or so miles away.

00:26:13.580 --> 00:26:17.260
That's the difference between
government and the free market.

00:26:17.260 --> 00:26:20.140
But that means government
needs <i>someone</i> to blame.

00:26:20.140 --> 00:26:23.420
When California badly
mismanaged its water systems,

00:26:23.420 --> 00:26:27.087
draining major lakes and waterways
and paving rivers with levees

00:26:27.088 --> 00:26:30.700
so that clean, potable water just
goes straight out to the ocean,

00:26:30.700 --> 00:26:37.233
leading the state with arguably the greatest water
resources in the country to drought-type restrictions,

00:26:37.234 --> 00:26:42.300
they had to blame everything from
almond farmers to global warming.

00:26:42.300 --> 00:26:48.940
And we saw idiocy like claiming that a gallon of water
was somehow embedded into every almond and lost forever.

00:26:48.940 --> 00:26:52.460
Of course not! That water
just went somewhere else.

00:26:52.460 --> 00:26:58.940
That's what water does. So now,
blame AI. Because why not, I guess.

00:26:58.940 --> 00:27:05.100
But again, no matter what, the water
goes <i>somewhere.</i> It always comes back.

00:27:05.100 --> 00:27:08.540
That's the water cycle we
all learned about in school.

00:27:08.540 --> 00:27:13.740
There is <i>tons</i> of potable water
all over the continental US.

00:27:13.740 --> 00:27:16.860
If we'd left it to market
forces, there'd be a nice,

00:27:16.860 --> 00:27:20.940
efficient nationwide infrastructure
just like there is with gasoline.

00:27:20.940 --> 00:27:26.460
Price would fluctuate based on conditions, meaning that
you wouldn't have to pass any sort of restrictions;

00:27:26.460 --> 00:27:29.340
people would naturally
restrict their water use

00:27:29.340 --> 00:27:33.580
the way they naturally restrict the
gasoline they use when shortages happen.

00:27:33.580 --> 00:27:40.540
And the result is that it would be much more
plentiful everywhere than it is anywhere right now.

00:27:40.540 --> 00:27:46.940
And even if you are in an area where you'd need to desalinate
water, hey, that's another reason for nuclear power!

00:27:46.940 --> 00:27:50.540
Because with just a few
extra inexpensive systems,

00:27:50.540 --> 00:27:56.700
nuclear power can desalinate water and turn
it into potable water delivered to the area.

00:27:56.700 --> 00:28:01.020
In fact, both the World Nuclear
Association and the IAEA

00:28:01.020 --> 00:28:05.820
have been recommending nuclear
desalination for over two decades!

00:28:05.820 --> 00:28:08.460
And that's just what I can
think of off the top of my head.

00:28:08.460 --> 00:28:11.740
Who knows what entrepreneurs would
come up with given the chance?

00:28:11.740 --> 00:28:16.140
There would be <i>so</i> many business
opportunities for large-scale potable water

00:28:16.140 --> 00:28:18.940
if government would just get out of it!

00:28:18.940 --> 00:28:22.700
At the very least, we wouldn't be
saddled with so-called "experts"

00:28:22.700 --> 00:28:26.860
who think that water goes away
forever when it evaporates!

00:28:26.860 --> 00:28:33.055
So all of that makes Robert Mace and <i>The
Economic Times</i> this week's Idiot Extraordinaire.

00:28:41.420 --> 00:28:45.100
Well, that wraps up this "the pellet with
the poison's in the vessel with the pestle"

00:28:45.100 --> 00:28:47.900
edition of the Bogosity
Podcast. I hope you enjoyed it;

00:28:47.900 --> 00:28:51.820
if you did, please go to donate.bogosity.tv
for several ways to support,

00:28:51.820 --> 00:28:56.220
and discord.bogosity.tv to join the
discussion. Subscribe at the Discord,

00:28:56.220 --> 00:29:00.060
Patreon, or SubscribeStar and
you can listen early and ad-free.

00:29:00.060 --> 00:29:03.740
Thank you for listening. Until next
time, here's a quote from F.A. Hayek:

00:29:03.740 --> 00:29:08.940
"Through the inevitable mismanagement of
resources and goods at the disposal of the state,

00:29:08.940 --> 00:29:12.620
all forms of collectivism
lead eventually to tyranny."

00:29:12.620 --> 00:29:16.700
The Bogosity Podcast is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives

00:29:16.700 --> 00:29:18.335
4.0 International license.